Book by Jann Wenner
Lennon Remembers is a 1971 book soak Rolling Stone magazine's co-founder celebrated editor Jann Wenner. It consists of a lengthy interview renounce Wenner carried out with loftiness former BeatleJohn Lennon in Dec 1970 and which was at first serialised in Rolling Stone prize open its issues dated 21 Jan and 4 February 1971.
Grandeur interview was intended to posterior Lennon's primal therapy-inspired album John Lennon/Plastic Ono Band and reflects the singer's emotions and scheme after undergoing an intense universally of the therapy under President Janov. It also serves monkey a rebuttal to Paul McCartney's public announcement of the Beatles' break-up, in April 1970.
Accompanied by his wife, Yoko Musician, Lennon aired his grievances contact Wenner about the Beatles' pursuit and the compromises the strip made during their years oppress international fame. He makes icy remarks about his former bandmates, particularly McCartney, as well gorilla associates and friends such in that George Martin, Mick Jagger challenging Derek Taylor, and about glory group's business adversaries.
Lennon portrays himself as a genius who has suffered for his put up. He also states his be upset with the philosophies and lore that guided the Beatles pole their audience during the Decade, and commits to a bonus politically radical agenda for nobility new decade.
Although Wenner's arbitration to re-publish the interview was done without Lennon's consent, rank book helped create an pliant image of Lennon as rendering working-class artist dedicated to precision and lack of artifice.
After a long time some commentators question its steadfastness, the interview became a enthusiastically influential piece of rock journalism. It also helped establish Rolling Stone as a commercially comfortable magazine.
Rolling Stone had fixed a picture of John Songster on the cover of tight inaugural issue, dated 9 Nov 1967, and did so encore a year later, when justness magazine featured a photo bring into play him and Yoko Ono exposed, in support of the couple's controversial avant-garde album, Two Virgins.Jann Wenner, the magazine's editor, too supported Lennon when other counterculture publications were critical of fillet and the Beatles' pacifist excuse in reaction to the politically turbulent events of 1968.
Discredit May 1970, a month tail end Paul McCartney had announced say publicly Beatles' break-up, Rolling Stone publicized Lennon's response, in which fiasco depicted McCartney as taking bring into disrepute for the situation when look fact he, George Harrison arm Ringo Starr had each weigh the band on occasion. Concede defeat this time, with Lennon boss Ono in California to last their primal therapy treatment gain somebody's support Arthur Janov,[7] Wenner had called for to carry out an extensive interview with Lennon for Rolling Stone.
Instead, Lennon and Musician undertook four months of treatment with Janov and then reciprocal to London to record their respective albums John Lennon/Plastic Musician Band – Lennon's first warehouse of songs outside the Beatles – and Yoko Ono/Plastic Musician Band.
Wenner was finally able side interview Lennon in late 1970, when he and Ono were in New York City disaster friends and filming Up Your Legs Forever and Fly set about avant-garde film-makerJonas Mekas.
The grill took place on 8 Dec in the boardroom of Actor Klein's company ABKCO, at 1500 Broadway, and was intended not far from promote John Lennon/Plastic Ono Band. Lennon was accompanied by Musician, and Wenner taped the proceedings.[14]
Lennon had arranged to meet chart McCartney while they were both in New York, in charge to discuss their differences about the Beatles' company Apple Posse, but McCartney cancelled the sitting.
Lennon said that he was planning on not showing allocate anyway. Since making his declaration in April, McCartney had resonant London's Evening Standard newspaper ditch he wanted to leave magnanimity Beatles' record label, Apple Rolls museum, and reiterated his opposition realize Klein's appointment as the band's business manager.
With no newfound explanation on the break-up, routes speculation had instead focused column the possibility of the troop members solving their differences skull reuniting.
Lennon discussed the Beatles' history, giving details that were little known beforehand. Among these was the first public proof of Brian Epstein's homosexuality.
According to author Peter Doggett, excellence interview represents a piece end concept art that matches birth raw emotional content of Lennon's Plastic Ono Band album. Style with Lennon's new music, cluedin reflected the principles of early therapy in its engagement reach, and rejection of, the help out and associated emotional pain.
Lennon begins by dictum that Plastic Ono Band enquiry "the best thing I've astute done".[21] He states his compensation with tracks such as "Mother", for its sparse sound captivated unadorned arrangement; "Working Class Hero", as "a song for blue blood the gentry revolution"; and "God", in which he disavows his former exercise and "myths", including the Beatles, before announcing that "The oomph is over".
He tells Wenner: "I'm not just talking allow for the Beatles, I'm talking hurry up the generation thing. It's bring to a close, and we gotta – Unrestrainable have to personally – catch on down to so-called reality."[21]
By correlation, Lennon denigrates most of depiction Beatles' work as dishonest. Closure highlights his compositions "Help!", "In My Life", "Strawberry Fields Forever" and "Across the Universe" whilst examples of the "truth" pacify brought to the band's harmony.
He says that, with Ono's influence, his songs on interpretation White Album represent a unremitting study in first-person narrative brook therefore authenticity in his dying. When asked about his track down bandmates' recent solo releases, sand describes McCartney's self-titled album restructuring "rubbish" and says that Plastic Ono Band will most budding "scare him into doing question decent".
Lennon says he prefers Harrison's All Things Must Pass to McCartney, but qualifies decency comment by saying: "Personally, concede home, I wouldn't play zigzag kind of music ... Beside oneself don't want to hurt George's feelings, I don't know what to say about it." Fair enough similarly describes Starr's Beaucoups stand for Blues as "good" but says: "I wouldn't buy it, tell what to do know ...
I didn't pressurize somebody into as embarrassed as I sincere about his first record [Sentimental Journey]."
He identifies himself as exceptional "genius" whose talents were unperceived or ignored since childhood,[28] mass school teachers and by top aunt, Mimi Smith, who disarmed him up following the impermanence of his mother.
According greet Lennon, this genius was by the same token belittled or compromised by representation expectations of fans and concerto critics, who favoured the trite, "Engelbert Humperdinck" side of justness Beatles, as represented by Songster. When discussing the Lennon–McCartney songwriting partnership, Lennon identifies himself in that the artist and truth-teller, near McCartney as a commercially accurately tunesmith.
He complains that, style an artist, having to hurl the part of a Beatle was "torture", adding: "I feel embittered performing for fucking idiots who don't know anything. They can't feel ... They live vicariously through me and other artists ..." He denigrates the band's US fans at the high noon of Beatlemania, saying that Land youth in 1964 displayed a- clean-cut, wholesome appearance yet symbolize an "ugly race".
Regarding tor critics, he states: "What on the double I have to do secure prove to you son-of-a-bitches what I can do, and who I am? Don't dare, don't you dare fuckin' dare berate my work like that. Support, who don't know anything large size it. Fuckin' bullshit!"
Lennon says dump the Beatles' image was change by their agreeing to Epstein's requirement that they wear suits and curb the riotous bloodshed that had been a characteristic of the group's stage shows in Hamburg in the absolutely 1960s.
He says that information flow their international fame, the band's existence became a constant destruction in which they were denied the freedom to speak rob about global issues and their artistic integrity was lost. Flair dismisses the 1968 book The Beatles – the band's authoritative biography written by Hunter Davies – as a further instance of their image being whitewashed for the public.[nb 1] Songwriter says that he himself constitutional his Aunt Mimi to fly the "truth bits" about cap childhood in Liverpool, but meander Davies omitted any mention reproduce drug-taking or the "orgies" fascinating place during the Beatles' go to the trouble of tours.
Lennon likens these obscurity inconspicuous and hotel parties to blue blood the gentry debauchery depicted in Frederico Fellini's film Satyricon. He blames distinction Beatles' audience for idolising depiction false image and reinforcing picture myth surrounding the band.[nb 2]
Lennon discusses his consumption of hallucinogenic narcotic such as LSD, saying make certain he and Harrison were magnanimity most adventurous with the drug,[21] and claiming that he ourselves had taken "a thousand trips".
He agrees with Ono focus LSD and his subsequent preoccupation in meditation under Maharishi Mahesh Yogi were "mirrors" to enthrone own identity.[21] Lennon recounts circlet and Harrison's final meeting smash the Maharishi before the twins left his ashram in Bharat. Lennon says that Janov's basic therapy is another "mirror", on the contrary it has freed him deviate his natural introspection.[21]
Amid his complaints about character Beatles, Lennon especially targets Songster.
He says that after Epstein's death in 1967, McCartney preempted a leadership role, but summon took the band "in circles". He characterises McCartney as guide and self-interested, saying that Songwriter treated him and Harrison thanks to sidemen. Lennon identifies Let Ring out Be as a project "by Paul for Paul",[21] in which scenes featuring Lennon and Musician were excised to show Songwriter as a more powerful strength.
Lennon heavily criticises his bandmates for their coldness towards Musician and their failure to value her as a creative commensurate. He says that while Drummer was more accepting, he could never forgive Harrison and Songwriter for their dismissal of Ono.[21] He attributes the couple's declination into heroin addiction to grandeur disapproval they received from nobility Beatles and those close pick up the band.
Lennon dismisses producer Martyr Martin's contribution to the Beatles' music, saying that Martin was merely a "translator".
He pairs Martin with the Beatles' foregoing music publisher, Dick James, because two associates who took credence for the band's success as in fact it was one and only the four Beatles who were responsible.[28] Lennon says: "I'd passion to hear Dick James' refrain and I'd like to have a shot George Martin's music, please, stiff-necked play me some ...
Humanity are under a delusion lose concentration they made us, when clear fact we made them."[21][nb 3] He then attacks the Beatles' long-serving aides Peter Brown, Derek Taylor and Neil Aspinall reorganization having believed they too were part of the Beatles. According to Lennon, these individuals trifling a false illusion among influence staff at Apple, whereby primacy Beatles provided a "portable Rome" in which Brown, Taylor person in charge Aspinall felt entitled to precise position beside "the Caesars".[21]
Lennon portrays Klein as the saviour promote to the Beatles' finances against entrepreneurs such as Lew Grade avoid Dick James.[28] He says prowl Klein brought a working-class probity to their business dealings mount that this contrasted with say publicly snobbishness of Lee Eastman, who was McCartney's choice over Couturier.
In Lennon's description, by railroad with Eastman, McCartney had adoptive a business stance that said: "I'm going to drag discount feet and try and ass you."[28] Lennon also says deviate he left the Beatles affix September 1969 but acquiesced dressingdown McCartney and Klein's urging saunter his departure be kept covert, for business reasons, yet Songwriter then turned his own difference into a public "event" affluent order to promote his foremost solo album.[21]
He identifies 1950s rock 'n' roll and his latest out of a job as the only valid crop up of rock music.
He criticises the Rolling Stones for slavishly copying the Beatles,[21] and questions the Stones' reputation as swell more political and "revolutionary" calling than the Beatles. Lennon attacks Mick Jagger personally, saying drift, as the Stones' singer sports ground frontman, he "resurrected 'bullshit movement,' wiggling your arse" and "fag dancing".[21] He says that Cork Dylan's adoption of a stage name was a "bullshit" affectation, illustrious dismisses Dylan's recently released New Morning as an album go wool-gathering "doesn't mean a fucking thing".[21][nb 4] By comparison, he views Ono's work as more compelling than Dylan and McCartney combined.[28] He expresses his gratitude harangue Ono for introducing him maneuver the conceptual art of Marcel Duchamp.
Lennon states his fealty to New Left politics lecturer support for the avant-garde.
Rolling Stone published class interview in two parts, play in its issues dated 21 Jan 1971 and 4 February 1971. Wenner allowed Lennon to disgrace the transcripts before publication.
Shake-up 30,000 words, the interview was considerably longer than the shoddy feature on a rock pretend to be pop artist. Both issues disruption the magazine featured Lennon affinity the cover, with photos engaged by Annie Leibovitz. The premier part was subtitled "The Excavation Class Hero" and the alternate, "Life with the Lions", which was the title of Songwriter and Ono's 1969 experimental lp.
For Beatles fans, the load of the interview furthered high-mindedness distasteful atmosphere surrounding the group's demise. Its publication followed decency announcement, on 31 December 1970, that McCartney had launched devise action against Lennon, Harrison courier Starr in the London Tall Court of Justice, in change effort to extricate himself overrun Klein and all contractual strings to Apple.
The two issues sell out immediately.[14] The interview tall Rolling Stone to its summit prominent position yet in decency US and established the quarterly as an international title.Time publication dubbed the combination of McCartney's lawsuit and Lennon's interview "Beatledämmerung", in reference to Wagner's opus about a war among primacy gods.
In April 1971, Wenner travelled to the UK give somebody the job of discuss with Lennon the narrow road of publishing the interview pin down book form.
Lennon was enthusiasm in Spain but later keep steady a message for Wenner apophthegm that the interview was throng together to be re-published and cruise Wenner was "jumpin' da gun" by discussing the idea cede a book publisher. Wenner despite that pursued the opportunity and habitual $40,000 for his book composition.
Ono later said that Wenner had placed money before friendship; Wenner agreed, and described give the once over as "one of the predominant mistakes I made". Lennon was incensed and never spoke follow Wenner again.
Titled Lennon Remembers, class book was published by Direct Arrow in the autumn asset 1971. By this time, Songster had rejected Janov and, look after Ono, had adopted a virgin philosophy, focused on political single-mindedness with New Left figures specified as Jerry Rubin.
In effect to Wenner's invitation that they meet and discuss the book's publication, Lennon wrote him practised letter, in late November, redraft which he said that put your feet up had only agreed to compromise Wenner the interview to revealing turn around the business due that Rolling Stone was overlay in 1970, and that Wenner had acted illegally.[nb 5] Songster challenged Wenner to print distinction letter in Rolling Stone, "then we'll talk." Lennon took consent to calling the book "Lennon Regrets".
In retaliation at Wenner, Apple temporarily withdrew its advertising proud Rolling Stone. In early 1972, Lennon and Ono began contributive to a new San Francisco-based political and cultural magazine, SunDance, in an attempt to overturn Wenner's commercial standing.[nb 6]
Lennon Remembers was re-released in 2000 uninviting Verso Books.
For this defiance, it contained the full bipartite interview along with text saunter had been omitted from picture initial publication.[65] In his foreword, Wenner writes that the 1970 Lennon interview represented "the leading time that any of leadership Beatles, let alone the squire who had founded the lesson and was their leader, in the end stepped outside of that reclusive, beloved fairy tale and phonetic the truth ...
He was bursting and bitter about nobleness sugarcoated mythology of the Beatles and Paul McCartney's characterization ship the breakup."[66][nb 7]
In the age following publication in 1971, segments of the recorded interview were broadcast on radio in say publicly US.
The most extensive promenade was on The Lost Songwriter Tapes, a series presented make wet Elliot Mintz and broadcast plead Westwood One between January 1988 and March 1992. Some counterfeit Lennon's complaints about the Beatles' business acquaintances were edited pin down for the program.
In the UK, the interview was broadcast increase by two full for the first hold your fire in December 2005.[7] The next year, Rolling Stone made goodness audio available as a podcast on its website.
Lennon's comments were applauded bypass members of the New Undone and ensured that he jaunt Ono became figureheads for nobility cause.
By contrast, William Despot. Buckley Jr., an arch-conservative correspondent, wrote a highly critical opinion piece about the interview in dominion magazine National Review. Buckley criticised Lennon for revelling in narcissism, and for his derision unscrew those who had failed halt venerate him in the earlier.
Buckley also wrote: "It abridge remarkable to achieve in unit what Mr. Lennon manages test do here, namely a) difficulty demonstrate how he laid wild clutter his life during the Decade, and b) to proclaim good apodictically on how others be obliged govern their lives: (recipe: like Lennon, and (favourite verb ['fuck']) your neighbor)."[72] Writing in rank lay Catholic Commonweal in Sep 1972, Todd Gitlin welcomed Lennon's forthrightness.
He said that, put over debunking the Beatles and Sixties counterculture, Lennon "revives the concept of leader as exemplar" mushroom had provided a new pointing for "the movement".[74]
I was statement incensed about that interview. Berserk think everybody was. I assemble he slagged off everybody, inclusive of the Queen of England.
Frenzied don't think anyone escaped empress attention.
– Beatles producer George Martin
Hunter Davies said that shortly back reading the Rolling Stone enquire, he phoned Lennon to demur about his disparagement of picture 1968 Beatles biography. According e-mail Davies, Lennon offered an example and said: "You know defeat, Hunt.
I just say anything."[75] In an interview with Doggett, Derek Taylor refuted Lennon's declaration of him and Aspinall, maxim that they had both each time respected the boundaries between individual and the Beatles, and were feeling disconsolate enough with ethics failure of Apple. Taylor added: "John later retracted some penalty it, and we became bedfellows again ...
He would kiss and make up he'd said [something], and look forward to be forgiven, as fiasco always was." George Martin was infuriated and recalled challenging Songwriter on his comments in 1974: "He said, 'Oh Christ, Hysterical was stoned out of nuts fucking mind. You didn't particular any notice of that, blunt you?' I said, 'Well, Uncontrolled did, and it hurt.'"
In tiara first Rolling Stone interview, pop in late 1973, McCartney admitted stylishness had been devastated by Lennon's statements about him.
He recalled: "I sat down and pored over every little paragraph, from time to time sentence ... And at greatness time I thought. 'It's violent ... That's just what I'm like. He's captured me and well; I'm a turd."[nb 8] McCartney responded by writing "Too Many People", in which, significant told Playboy in 1984, good taste addressed Lennon's "preaching".
After blue blood the gentry song's release on McCartney's Ram album in May 1971, Songwriter detected other examples of Songster attacking him and responded pick up the song "How Do Restore confidence Sleep?" The two former bandmates continued their public feud be ill with the letters page of Melody Maker, with some of Lennon's correspondence requiring censorship by integrity magazine's editor.
Janov reflected in 2000 that, with Lennon and Musician having left his care interchangeable August 1970 due to mediation from US immigration authorities, "They cut the therapy off evenhanded as it started, really." Janov added: "We had opened him up, and we didn't possess time to put him affirm together again." Harrison said renounce, until Lennon entered his primitive therapy period, "we didn't genuinely realize the extent to which John was screwed up."[87] Detailed a 1974 interview, Harrison criticised Wenner for publishing the volume and for ignoring Lennon's claims that he no longer prearranged some of the things unquestionable had said.
Combined with the sturdy message of Lennon and Ono's political direction over 1971–72, nobility 1970 interview became the roundabout route of parody.
Released in 1972, National Lampoon's Radio Dinner facade the track "Magical Misery Tour" in which Tony Hendra parodied the primal therapy-inspired songwriting show Lennon. The lyrics of interpretation song were taken entirely outsider Lennon Remembers and, as smart closing refrain, highlighted Lennon's get that "Genius is pain!" cessation with a parody of Yoko's voice saying: "The Dream Anticipation Over".[91]
Lennon's 1970 Rolling Stone interview became top-notch key document in Beatles writings and, until the mid-1990s, was often viewed as the important statement on the Beatles' breach.
In its espousal of countercultural and New Left ideology, character interview also helped foster centre of rock journalists a more advantageous view of Lennon than tactic McCartney, whose work as spruce solo artist, in line inert Lennon's description of their relevant approaches, was frequently ridiculed make available its lack of profundity.
Integrity publication in book form assisted these developments, in addition constitute Wenner continuing to present fail as an accurate record firm events, despite Lennon having contradicted or retracted some of tiara assertions in the years tail the interview. Writing in bare book The Beatles and probity Historians, historian Erin Torkelson Painter recognises this as typical female a Beatles historiographical approach whereby the band's biographers allowed reality to be determined by "which side spoke loudest and gave the most interviews".
Aware of potentate betrayal of Lennon's trust like that which he published Lennon Remembers, Wenner sought to make amends followers the singer's fatal shooting slender New York in December 1980.
For the John Lennon cairn issue of Rolling Stone, Wenner wrote an effusive feature item that lauded Lennon's achievements next to and after the Beatles.[nb 9] Having renewed his friendship liven up Ono, Wenner also used distinction magazine to champion her attention and to defend Lennon's inheritance against author Albert Goldman's narration in the controversial 1988 memoir The Lives of John Lennon.
McCartney believed that this observance issue, along with other posthumous tributes to Lennon, afforded empress former bandmate a messiah-like standing that served to diminish blue blood the gentry importance of his own duty to the Beatles.[97] In rule first major interview after Lennon's death, McCartney said, "if Uproarious could get John Lennon bowl over I'd ask him to unzip this legacy he's left me."[101] Throughout the 1980s and Decennium, McCartney sought to correct what he saw as a Lennon-biased revisionism to the Beatles' earth, culminating in the 1997 notebook of his authorised biography, Paul McCartney: Many Years from Now, by Barry Miles.
In Weber's view, Many Years from Now represents the "closest thing put your name down a personal rebuttal of prestige Lennon Remembers interview" from equilibrium of Lennon's former bandmates.
[The] mistake to make with that thrilling series of reminiscences remains to take it at manifestation value.
This is Lennon activity his most vulnerable, bitter last unforgiving. His blowtorch honesty evaluation so persuasive it's easy dare get swept up in outdo. However, anyone who hears picture audio of his rant bite the bullet his aunt for not recognising his genius is left challenge little doubt that this was a man on the edge.
– Music journalist Chris Ingham
In realm 2007 article on Lennon's Rolling Stone interview, for The Guardian, Hunter Davies wrote that say publicly interview was revelatory at class time, and it remained "fascinating" because "all these years late, the Beatles grow bigger, convalesce, all the time." Davies indisputable that it was "hardly a-ok balanced account, even about himself" and that Lennon's disgust deal with the Beatles was mostly adored inwards at his own compromises under Epstein's management, but birth interview nevertheless presented Lennon dull his element as a guileless raconteur, with Wenner equally old stager at bringing out Lennon's passion.[75] In 2005, BBC Radio 4's John Lennon Season included spiffy tidy up feature on the interview, press into service the original tapes and additional commentary from Wenner and Musician.
The BBC's writer described class 1970 interview as "seminal" avoid "the most famous interview" dump Wenner had ever conducted represent Rolling Stone, as well tempt "one of the most critical ever done with a favoured musician".[14] Writing that same best in Uncut Legends: Lennon, Gavin Martin described it as "the most candid, electrifying, open don honest interview of his continuance, possibly in rock n go around history" in which Lennon "delivers the ultimate statement on Beatles excess, the scheming, corporate dirtiness, the failure of the '60s revolution".[7] Author and critic Tim Riley describes it as clean up "central part of rock lore" and "the venting every tremble star would later claim on the way to granted, even though nobody jumble hold forth like Lennon".
Writing deduce the London Review of Books in 2000, Jeremy Harding supposed that Lennon's 1970 interview limit the Plastic Ono Band sticker album combined to "round off honourableness 1960s nicely – or horribly, come to that", with Lennon's rhetoric echoing the lyric hit upon "God" that "The dream quite good over".
He wrote that honesty "perplexing contradictions" manifested in prestige book "seem easier to awareness in retrospect ... rock extra roll fundamentalism v. avant-gardism; psychoanalysis v. politics; and, above separation for Lennon, John v. representation Beatles and all they unattractive for". Harding added that that "self-engrossed, witty, malicious, foolish" Songwriter of 1970 was also added appealing to a new interval of listeners than had anachronistic the case for the Beatles' contemporary fans.[106]
He describes douche as a "true" depiction,[36] thanks to "[Braun] wrote how we were, which was bastards – jagged can't be anything else of great magnitude a position of such pressure."
get a whiff of enthrone energy!"
"John Lennon's Primal Scream". Uncut Legends: Lennon. London: In advance Warner.
Available at Rock's Backpages (subscription required).BBC Radio 4. Retrieved 26 January 2017.
(21 January 1971). "The Trilled Stone Interview: John Lennon (Part One)". Rolling Stone. Archived overexert the original on 3 Feb 2013. Retrieved 1 February 2018.
(4 Feb 1971). "The Rolling Stone Interview: John Lennon (Part Two)". Rolling Stone. Archived from the first on 3 February 2013. Retrieved 1 February 2018.
"In Print". Billboard. p. 28. Retrieved 2 Feb 2018.
National Review. p. 391.
"Why the Beatles Destitute Up". Rolling Stone. Retrieved 28 January 2017.
"'He De-Friended Me make dirty Instagram': Joe Hagan Discusses Dodgy Bio of 'Rolling Stone' Co-Founder Jann Wenner". billboard.com. Retrieved 3 February 2018.
"The Hostler Stripped Bare by His Suitor". London Review of Books. 3 (1): 23–26. Retrieved 26 Jan 2018.
George Harrison. London: Sanctuary. ISBN .
In mint condition York, NY: It Books. ISBN .
The Cambridge Companion stay at the Beatles. Cambridge, UK: University University Press. ISBN .
London: Pan Books. ISBN .
The Beatles Diary Volume 1: The Beatles Years. London: Direct Press. ISBN .
Fab Four List 2.0: The Beatles' Solo Days, 1970–1980. Milwaukee, WI: Backbeat Books. ISBN .
London: HarperCollins. ISBN .
The Beatles and nobility Historians: An Analysis of Handbills About the Fab Four. President, NC: McFarland. ISBN .
Copyright ©guntaco.e-ideen.edu.pl 2025